Still haven't learned that disagreeing with you != "right-winger"
Me too. Throw in the money squandered on welfare (both kinds, to the poor and to corporations), black projects (although if they weren't black, I could probably see supporting some of them), job programs which only provide jobs for people to run them, ghost payrollers, connected contractors, Daley's reconfiguration of Ohare and paving over of bensenville, and countless other things.
fuel economy in car commercials 4757Could you please trim parker? You did years ago. Now you're just a lazy slacker. Spent. First on the vietnam war. Sure you can try the call the IOU an 'investment' but it...
I am sure the greys in the space craft hovering above your workplace feel sorry for you.
fuel economy in car commercials 4754it At least we're going to get something back from what we've paid to SS, unlike what we've paid to Bush's war machine. 'republicans-are-going-to...
Much like the greys.
What's your point Parker? I haven't mentioned stock at all. I simply want a property interest in the money taken from me by the government because elites like yourself have declared the populace too stupid to save on their own.
What about surplus gone and not enough income to cover outgo do you not understand? You haven't even read it have you Dr. Parker?
Parker, not having visited the SSA website, but knowing it is there resorts to insult because he doesn't have any backup. If I am wrong Dr. Parker, why don't you just quote the relevant sections? Much more effective than just throwing around insults.
Of course not. But there is no plan for solvency on the table. The two plans on the table are do nothing and have a little property interest in the money taken from us. Those are the choices presented. And why do you even care Dr. Parker? You'll be dead before it goes breasts up either way. I'm the one that needs to care. Why isn't there a plan for solvency on the table? Why hasn't your wing of the effective one party proposed one?
Not with the money that the government takes from me. That's the point. I am losing around 12% of my earnings (there is no such thing as a employer portion, that's money I have to produce value for to be employed) to SS every year. An IRA doesn't change that. If I had the 12% SS is taking from me, then the funds I am saving could be freed up for other purposes.
Figured you go silent when I mentioned liking Clinton's proposal for private accounts above the status quo too... You're all politics Parker. You'd be all for invading Iraq too if the democrats had done it in 1998.
