Or that of others?
If you had said "No" I'd have more reason to be upset.
Or that of others?
I get the gist now.
Even if there was no risk to your own safety? You disappoint me. I sense a slight inconsistency here.
Having jumped it, and survived, I guess you wouldn't complain?
Clever.
Wouldn't it depend on the necessity for the actual lines at the particular location?
Could all road users co-exist in harmony if we each chose which laws we were going to respect?
So, in fact, most motoring laws are unnecessary?
two laws uU|G*dfHK8Zr48 5141Depends on the situation. Glad to hear it :-) Depends on the situation. Good. No. You said "one drink too many". I don't see how there...
So for an unrespected law to be complied with it needs a significant penalty behind it? What about a small penalty but a BIG chance of getting caught?
So you respect the spirit of most laws, including motoring laws? Is it an "intelligence" thing. Thick people need more laws because they cannot think it through for themselves. The more inellecturally gifted must tolerate the imposition for the sake of harmony?
Very humble of you to say so ;-)
Inane - adjective - extremely silly or lacking real meaning or importance.
I'm sorry if you think any of my previous questions fit that definition, but, IMHO, they each had a very real importance.
-- Matt B
